Understanding The Vedas In The Light Of The Vedas: Chapter 2

The Vedas are known by various names such as Shruti, Agama and Apaurusheya. The literal meaning of the word ‘Veda’ is ‘to know. However, the knowledge which is provided by the sense organs or merely understood as commonsense cannot be the subject matter of the Vedas. In case the Vedas state what is seen by eyes such as a jar or a fire which the mind could easily imply by seeing smoke then what is the importance of the Vedas! Thus, the subject matters of the Vedas are those which could not be known otherwise and cannot be disproved by other means. Hence, the Vedas are self-evident (svatah pramana).

For example, the Vedas talk about Indra in Swarga and the equivalence of Jiva and Brahman. These things cannot be known other than the Vedas and no other valid knowledge can disprove them. So, how to know their authenticity?

First and foremost is that the Vedic statement should not oppose the other valid means of knowledge.

“If I see a jar and hundreds of Vedic statements say that it is not a jar then I should believe my eyes not the Vedas” – Adi Shankaracharya.

Therefore, the Vedic statements should not oppose the standards of reasoning.



Next is the peer review. The same statements are made by various Vedic passages coming from different shakhas. Sometimes the phrases are exactly the same. The shakhas were owned by the generation of Rishis. The Rishis were trustworthy experts in the spiritual field of knowledge. Some of the trustworthy experts may go wrong, however, when all the Rishis are of the same opinion then there is hardly any scope for doubt.

How they got this knowledge? No one claim to be the origin of knowledge. Any knowledge however great and coming from a person of high trust cannot be called Veda. It’s a Smriti since it has an origin in the intellect of a person. The Vedas are passed from teacher to pupil across the generations as it is received by their teacher without a minor change in pronouncement. So, its origin loses its meaning in the eternal past.

For example, the Kathopnishad narrates a story which occurred in a distant past and within the story Yama, the teacher states to his disciple Nachiketa that in the beginning the gods too had a doubt. The intact knowledge that came to the Yama by the generation of teachers that existed before him, cannot be calculated on a time scale.

  • Since, this knowledge survives in an unending tradition of preceptor and student, therefore, it is called Agama.
  • Since it has no human origin, it is called Apaurusheya.
  • Since it is intact throughout the generation through verbal transmission although scripted for at least five thousand years, it is called Shruti.

Previous Post Next Post

Contact Form